• 首页 | 主办单位 | 期刊简介 | 编委会 | 作者指南 | 刊物订阅 | 下载中心 | 联系我们 | English | 期刊界
引用本文:何羽丰,陈廷贵,杨杨.长江禁捕补偿政策满意度影响因素及提升策略研究:模糊集定性比较分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(9):210~220
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 302次   下载 113 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
长江禁捕补偿政策满意度影响因素及提升策略研究:模糊集定性比较分析
何羽丰1,陈廷贵1,2,杨杨3
1.上海海洋大学经济管理学院,上海 201306;2.长江水域生态保护战略研究中心,上海 201306;3.上海海洋大学文化与法律学院,上海 201306
摘要:
目的 长江禁捕补偿政策的实施是我国贯彻“生态优先,绿色发展”理念的重要举措,探究退捕渔民对禁捕补偿政策满意度影响因素有利于政策主观绩效的提升。方法 文章以在全国率先实施禁捕补偿政策的贵州赤水河流域和湖北洪湖流域的退捕渔民为研究对象,运用模糊集定性比较分析方法(fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, fsQCA)探究禁捕补偿政策满意度的影响因素。结果 (1)政策认同和生计结果的缺失分别为解释禁捕补偿政策高满意度和低满意度的必要条件。(2)存在引致高禁捕补偿政策满意度的两种条件组态,其中补贴时效和信息掌握是影响禁捕补偿政策满意度的关键因素,在提高禁捕政策满意度中发挥核心作用;(3)存在4种引致低禁捕补偿政策满意度的条件组态,补贴时效和信息掌握的缺失在各自组态中均发挥了核心作用,使补贴时效和信息掌握的重要性得到进一步验证。(4)根据条件因素的可控性,加强政策的宣传力度和提高补偿资金发放时效是有效提升禁捕补偿政策满意度的最佳策略。结论 多重条件间并发协同效应的存在揭示禁捕补偿政策满意度影响因素的复杂性,对政策宣传和补偿资金发放工作“两手抓”是提高禁捕补偿政策满意度的必然选择。
关键词:  长江禁捕  政策满意度  模糊集定性比较分析  影响因素  提升策略
DOI:10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20220921
分类号:F323
基金项目:上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“长江大保护背景下禁捕补偿制度及退捕渔民生计研究”(2019BGL011);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“长江流域重点水域禁捕补偿政策影响研究”(20YJA790081 )
INFLUENCING FACTORS AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE SATISFACTION WITH THE FISHING BAN POLICY IN THE YANGTZE RIVER BASIN:A FUZZY-SET QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
He Yufeng1, Chen Tinggui1,2, Yang Yang3
1.College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;2.Yangtze River Ecological Protection Strategy Research Center, Shanghai 201306, China;3.College of Marine Culture and Law, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
Abstract:
Against the background of the implementation of the fishing ban policy in the Yangtze River Basin and by using the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method, we take the fishermen of the Chishui River Basin of Guizhou and Honghu of Hubei as research objects to explore the combined effects of various factors on the satisfaction with the policy. The results indicated that: (1) Policy identity and the absence of life quality were necessary conditions to explain high and low satisfaction levels. (2) There were two key configurations to improve the satisfaction with the policy: Subsidy payment time and policy comprehension were the key factors affecting the satisfaction with the compensation policy, which, in turn, played a central role in improving the satisfaction with the fishing ban policy. (3) There were four configurations that resulted in low levels of satisfaction with the fishing ban policy; the absence of conditional variables of subsidy payment time and policy comprehension played a key role in all configurations, which underscored the importance of these two factors. (4) Taken together, enhancing the publicity of the policy and timely payment of subsidies were feasible choices to effectively improve the satisfaction with the compensation policy. It concludes that the combined effects of these factors reveal the complexity of the factors that influence policy satisfaction. Consideration should be given to both, the policy advocacy and the compensation payment, which are necessary ways to improve fishermen’s satisfaction with the fishing ban policy.
Key words:  fishing ban in the Yangtze River Basin  satisfaction with policy  fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis  influencing factors  improvement strategies
版权所有:  您是本站第    位访问者
主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部 主办单位:中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所
中国农业绿色发展研究会 地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号
电话:010-82109628、82109647 电子邮件:quhuabjb@caas.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备11039015号