| 摘要: |
| 目的 对国内外的农业绿色发展研究现状、研究热点和发展趋势进行整体分析，总结相关领域研究中存在的主要问题，为今后我国农业绿色发展提供参考和建议。方法 文章基于Web of Science数据库和CNKI中国学术文献网络出版总库，采用CiteSpace和VOSviewer软件对文献进行可视化计量分析，主要对农业绿色发展领域的国内外研究力量、研究热点以及演变趋势进行解析。结果 1986—2019年农业绿色发展研究领域的计量分析结果如下：（1）外文文献2007年以后呈快速增长趋势，而中文文献2013年以后呈缓慢波动上升趋势。（2）外文文献发表数量最多的研究机构依次为中国科学院、美国农业部和法国国家农业、食品和环境研究所；中文文献数量最多的研究机构依次为中国农业科学院、华中农业大学和中国农业大学。（3）外文文献发表数量排名前三的期刊分别为Sustainability、Agriculture，Ecosystems & Environment和Journal of Cleaner Production，其中Agriculture，Ecosystems & Environment的篇平均被引频次最高（72次/篇）。中文文献发表数量排名前三的期刊分别为《农业经济》《中国农业资源与区划》和《农业现代化研究》，其中《农业现代化研究》的篇平均被引频次最高（23次/篇）。（4）外文相关文献的研究热点逐渐由“可持续的农业质量评估”向“农业管理与保护”和“土地利用”等转变；中文相关文献的研究热点逐渐由“农业可持续”和“农业生态与资源”向“绿色农业”和“现代农业”等转变。结论 在农业绿色发展研究领域，中文文献的发表数量亟需增加，国内机构在外文文献发表数量和质量上仍有很大的提升空间。在国内，“农业绿色发展”概念逐步取代农业可持续发展，成为新的研究主题和发展趋势。已有的外文文献更侧重于定量评估与管理体系，而中文文献多侧重于产品技术与政策评价。目前国内农业绿色发展在理论评估和实践管理等方面均存在问题，文章对此提出了针对性的重点拓展方向，可为未来的农业绿色或可持续发展提供参考建议。 |
| 关键词: 农业绿色发展 文献计量 可持续 研究热点 主要问题 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20210201 |
| 分类号:S-1 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“特大城市生态系统服务供需均衡演变及驱动机制研究——以北京市为例”（41901227）；国家自然科学基金联合基金项目“赤红壤区耕地质量演变机理与提升机制”（U1901601） |
|
| BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL GREEN DEVELOPMENT |
|
Sun Xiao1,2, Yang Peng1,2, Wang Hongyang1,2
|
|
1.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;2.Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing (AGRIRS), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China
|
| Abstract: |
| This study aims to summarize the research status, hotspots, and development trends of agriculture green development in China and other countries all over the world. The main problems and corresponding strategies we put forward in related fields also can provide references and suggestions for China’s agriculture green development in the future. The related literatures were collected from Web of Science and China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI). The CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used for visual bibliometric analysis. We mainly analyzed and compared the research strength, hotspots, and evolution trends in the field of agricultural green development. From 1986 to 2019, the results were showed as follows. (1) The papers published in foreign journals showed a rapid growth trend after the year 2007. However, the related papers published in Chinese journals showed a slow and fluctuating rising trend from the year 2013. (2) The research institutions with the largest number of published papers in foreign journals were Chinese Academy of Sciences, United States Department of Agriculture, and French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment.The research institutions with the largest number of published papers in Chinese journals were Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, and China Agricultural University. (3) For Web of Science core database, the top three journals in the number of published papers were Sustainability, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, and Journal of Cleaner Production. Among them, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment had the highest average citation (72 citations per paper). For CNKI database, the top three journals in the number of published papers were Agricultural Economy, Journal of China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, and Research of Agricultural Modernization. Among them, Research of Agricultural Modernization had the highest average citation (23 citations per paper). (4) The research hotspots of foreign related literatures had gradually shifted from “sustainable agricultural quality assessment” to “agricultural management and protection” and “land use”. The research hotspots of Chinese related literatures had gradually shifted from “agricultural sustainability” and “agricultural ecology and resources” to “green agriculture” and “modern agriculture”. In conclusion, there is an urgent need to increase the number of Chinese literatures in the field of agricultural green development. The quantity and quality of foreign papers published by domestic institutions also need to be greatly improved. In China, the concept of agricultural green development had gradually replaced the agricultural sustainable development and become a new research topic and trend. Foreign literatures focus more on quantitative assessment and management systems, while Chinese literatures focus more on product technology and policy evaluation. So far, there are some problems in theoretical evaluation and practical management of agricultural green development in China. Therefore, this study put forward corresponding research directions and references for future agricultural green or sustainable development. |
| Key words: agricultural green development bibliometrics sustainable research hotspots main problems |
