| 摘要: |
| 目的 在全面推进乡村振兴和助力农民农村共同富裕的背景下，研究土地流转对农户收入的影响效应和作用机制，具有重要的意义。方法 文章基于国家重要农业资源台账数据库中甘肃省550户样本数据，运用最小二乘法探讨了土地流转对农户收入及其各个构成部分的影响。在此基础上，进一步运用中介效应模型和Sobel检验分析了土地流转对农户增收产生影响的作用机制。结果 （1）土地流转具有增收效应。参与土地流转使农户总收入提升22.7%，务农收入提升29.4%，但土地流转对务工收入的影响不显著。（2）不同的土地流转类型对农户收入的影响不同。土地转出对农户总收入无显著影响，但使务农收入降低37.1%，务工收入提升22%；土地转入使农户总收入提升32.9%，务农收入提升49.2%，对务工收入的影响虽为负但不显著，总体上实现了对农户总收入的增收效应，并且不同的土地转入规模的收入效应存在差异，表现为大规模转入户的平均收入更高。（3）土地流转对不同农户收入的影响存在差异。土地流转对受教育程度高的农户的总收入和务农收入的影响更大；对农业依赖程度高的农户，土地流转对其总收入和务农收入有显著的正向影响，而对农业依赖程度低的农户，土地流转对其总收入和务农收入的影响则不显著。（4）农业生产性固定投资在土地流转促进农户增收中起了部分中介效应。土地流转对农户总收入的影响大约有14.10%是通过农业生产性固定投资的中介作用实现的。结论 土地流转能够提升农户收入，农业生产性固定投资在其中发挥着中介作用。因此，应加快健全土地流转市场，鼓励农户参与土地流转；同时，提供相关政策扶持，鼓励农户加大农业生产性固定投资，进一步提高农户收入。 |
| 关键词: 土地流转 农业生产性固定投资 农户增收 务农收入 务工收入 中介效应 |
| DOI：10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20250510 |
| 分类号:F323 |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“基于资源约束和社会规范视角农户绿色生产‘强意愿弱行为’研究”（20BJY083） |
|
| LAND TRANSFER, FIXED INVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND FARMERS' INCOME INCREASE——BASED ON NATIONAL IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES ACCOUNT |
|
Shi Zhiheng1, Liu Xingcui2, Zhang Hua3,4
|
|
1.College of Agriculture and Forestry Economic and Management, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China;2.School of Statistics and Data Science, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China;3.State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arable Land in China, Beijing 100081, China;4.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
|
| Abstract: |
| In the context of comprehensively promoting rural revitalization and facilitating common prosperity for farmers and rural areas, it is of great significance to study the impact and mechanism of land transfer on farmers' income. Utilizing the database of the National Important Agricultural Resources account, this study selected 550 households in Gansu province as sample data. And the least squares method was employed to explore the influence of land transfer on farmers' income and its various components. Additionally, the mediating effect model and Sobel test were further applied to analyze how land transfer impacts farmers' incomes. The results revealed that: (1) Land transfer had a positive effect on farmers' income. Participating in land transfer led to a 22.7% increase in farmers' total income, with farming income increasing by 29.4%. However, there was no significant impact on off-farm work income resulting from land transfer. (2) Different types of land transfer had different impacts on farmers' income. Land transfer-out had no significant impact on farmers' total income, but reduced the income from farming by 37.1% and increased the income from off-farm work by 22%. Land transfer-in increased farmers' total income by 32.9%, with the income from farming increased by 49.2%; although its impact on off-farm work income was negative, but not statistically significant, it generally realized an income-increasing effect on farmers' total income. The income effects varied with the scale of the transfers-in, with a higher average income for large-scale transferee households. (3) Land transfer had varying impacts on different farmers' income. Farmers with higher education levels experienced greater improvements in both their total household and farming incomes due to land transfers. For those who were heavily reliant on agriculture, land transfer had a significant positive influence on their overall household and farming incomes as well. Conversely, for farmers with low dependence on agriculture, there was no statistically significant impact observed regarding their total household or farming incomes. (4) The fixed investment in agriculture production played a partially mediating role in promoting farmers' income growth through land transfer. Approximately 14.10% of the impact of land transfer on farmers' total income was realized through the mediating role of the fixed investment in agriculture production. In summary, land transfer has the potential to increase farmers' income, and the fixed investment in agriculture production plays an intermediary role in this process. Therefore, it is imperative to expedite the establishment of a robust land transfer market and encourage farmers to participate in land transfer. At the same time, relevant policy support should be provided to encourage farmers to enhance their fixed investment in agriculture production and further augment their income. |
| Key words: land transfer fixed investment in agriculture production increase in farmers' income farming income off-farm work income mediating effect |
